I've moved — check out my new blog at cassyfiano.com!

Redirecting in 10 seconds...
Showing posts with label Republicans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republicans. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Are Republicans as equal as the Code Pinkos?

I guess we'll see. They've asked for a protest permit with the same privileges as the Code Pinkos... in Berkeley. Who's betting that their request will be denied?
The Berkeley College Republicans are looking to get the same permit privileges that anti-war group Code Pink use to protest outside the Marine recruiting center in Downtown Berkeley.

Working with Councilmember Kriss Worthington, the group is asking for sound waiver permits and a parking spot reservation outside the center on Wednesdays from 12 to 4 p.m., the same time Code Pink protests outside the center, said Kimberly Wagner, activism chair for the Berkeley College Republicans.

“(Code Pink’s) claim is that they’re protecting free speech,” she said. “I kind of don’t feel they are, they are inhibiting the recruitment center in general. It’s important that they are not unopposed, that there are people willing to fight them. Even though it’s Berkeley, the liberal center of America, there will be people (opposed).”

Worthington is working to have the item appear on an agenda in May.

My guess is that their request will be denied.

The group is also circulating to make the recruitment center a protected zone -- sure to go over well with the Berkeley libs.

While I'm glad that someone in Berkeley is standing up to the Code Pinkos (it sure as hell needed to be done), I can't help but wonder what the Marines think. I highly doubt that they ever anticipated that opening a recruitment center in Berkeley would bring on this much attention or put them in this kind of political crossfire. And I doubt that they want this much protesting going on in front of their office, even if it is to support them. It's great that the College Republicans are doing this, but I don't see how it improves the situation for the Marines -- do you?

Hat Tip: Michelle Malkin

Previous:
Video of the Day
Video of the Day: "Peaceful" protesting in Berkeley
Medea Benjamin finds that the Marines can be useful
"We've served this nation to protect the likes of ingrates like you."
Berkeley moonbats are attacking the police now, too
The Code Pink wackos strike again

Friday, October 19, 2007

Breaking News: Mel Martinez resigns

Mel Martinez has announced that he is stepping down as the RNC Chair.
Mel Martinez, the public face of the Republican National Committee as its general chairman, announced Friday he was stepping down from his post after serving only 10 months.

"I believe that our future as a party and nation is bright and I have every intention of continuing to fight for our president, our party and our candidates," the Florida senator said in a statement.

His resignation came months earlier than anticipated. Martinez wasn't expected to step down until a Republican presidential nominee was selected, and the earliest that could occur is February.

The RNC said Martinez' job would not be filled.

Martinez said he was relinquishing the job to spend more time focusing on his constituents and because the RNC had achieved the objective he set when he assumed the job in January.

"It was my goal as general chairman to lead the party as it established the structure and raised the resources necessary to support our presidential candidate and ensure Republican victories next November. I believe we have accomplished those goals," Martinez said.

Republicans are cheering across the nation.

Monday, August 13, 2007

Ron Paul is taking over my city!!

Something strange has happened. As I've been driving to various places the past two days, I've noticed something scary, slightly funny, and noticeably different.

There are Ron Paul banners. EVERYWHERE.

I've begun seeing them on interstates, boulevards, residential streets... they are literally everywhere. Knowing that this means there are undoubtedly Ron Paul supporters at work, and knowing how they tend to be a little bit... uh... different, it makes me slightly nervous. I guess I just never knew that north Florida was such a political hotspot. I mean, during the last presidential election I practically begged the Duval County Republican Party to let me volunteer, and nothing. I had to drive a few hours away to the Democrat-heavy Daytona to help campaign (that was one of the best weekends of my life, facing off against near-violent Kerry supporters, and I'm not being sarcastic -- it was LOADS of fun). Here in Duval, they don't seem to really do much, perhaps because Duval County almost always votes Republican, they feel they don't need to.

At any rate, apparently Ron Paul supporters have taken over. I haven't seen a banner for one other candidate, Republican or Democrat. And when I think of Ron Paul supporters invading, for some reason it makes me think of zombies. I'm not entirely sure why, but I just get this vision in my head of zombies, all dead-eyed, marching around while moaning, "RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT. RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT."

It's a well-known fact that most of his supporters are truthers, nutjobs, and spammers who for some reason are more attached to him than John Edwards is attached to hairspray and mousse. And they've congregated to my city, for some unknown reason. Should make for some interesting times coming up!

Join the Ron Paul Revolution? No thanks.

Tommy Thompson drops out

Not a surprise, considering he said that if he didn't do well (meaning come in first or second) in the Iowa straw poll, he would drop out.

And, guess what happened?
Saying he has 'no regrets', Governor Tommy Thompson thanked his supporters Saturday night and officially left the campaign trail.

"I want to thank the people of Iowa who were welcoming and supportive as well as my volunteers and contributors from around the country," said Thompson. "I have no regrets about running. I felt my record as Governor of Wisconsin and Secretary of Health and Human Services gave me the experience I needed to serve as President, but I respect the decision of the voters. I am leaving the campaign trail today, but I will not leave the challenges of improving health care and welfare in America."

Thompson, who was elected to serve four terms as Wisconsin Governor and four years as Secretary of Health and Human Services, began exploring a presidential bid last December. Weeks ago, he told supporters and the news media that if he did not do well in the Iowa Straw Poll, he would step aside and leave others to work for the Republican nomination.

"No candidate is more experienced than Governor Thompson and no candidate worked harder; but sometimes the dynamics just aren't there to bring about a victory," said Steve Grubbs, Senior Advisor to Thompson's campaign. "The Governor's staff was deeply committed to him and to his candidacy. If we could have willed a victory, we would have."

Thompson will return to the private sector as well as his non-profit work after a brief time off.

"I have very much enjoyed my years in public service and I am comforted by the fact that I think I made a difference for people during that time. I hope to continue working to serve others over the next few years," said Thompson.

I don't know enough about Thompson to say too much about him. But I did see him in debates, and while he certainly came across as passionate, but he always seemed to come off a little bit crazy to me -- he'd get fired up about something, his face would turn completely red, and I was just waiting for him to start spitting fire with smoke coming out of his ears. He reminded me a lot of a cartoon character.

Oh well -- as Brian from Iowa Voice said, I'm sure he's a good man, and I wish him the best of luck in whatever he chooses to pursue.

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

John Hawkins interviews Bernard Goldberg

I love Bernard Goldberg's books. I think he's a great writer, and he's got a way of putting things just perfectly. And I absolutely cannot wait to read his new book, Crazies to the Left of Me, Wimps to the Right: How One Side Lost Its Mind and the Other Lost Its Nerve.

So when John Hawkins, my absolute favorite blogger, interviewed Bernard Goldberg, one of my absolute favorite writers, I knew it was a must read. And it did not disappoint.

Here is one of my favorite excerpts:

John Hawkins: Well, let me ask you this: what has happened to the Democratic Party? How is it that they've gotten so far away from what people like you believe in, in so many areas?

Bernard Goldberg: That's a very good question. I think it started -- I don't want to do a history thing here -- but I think it started with McGovern. That's when the party became elitist. That's when the delegation to the National Democratic convention, for instance, the Iowa delegation, didn't have any farmers. But, they had more than a few people who had graduate degrees. I'm not against a lot of education…but I think that's when the party started to become too elitist for my taste.

Then, we'll just bring it up to the current day and skip over all the middle stuff... I think with the election of George Bush in the year 2000… that's when liberals said he stole the election, and they've never really gotten over it. That's when liberals who used to be the upbeat ones, the optimistic ones, started getting angrier and angrier. That's when they started losing people like me.

My story resonates with millions and millions and millions of other Americans who started up on the left, and wound up on the right because they didn't feel comfortable in the Democratic Party anymore. It became a party of grievances. You know, in the beginning, I was for civil rights... I still am. But, being for civil rights at some point wasn't good enough, now I have to be for racial preferences. I have to be for a system that decides who gets into college, who gets government jobs, and gets government contracts largely based on the color of their skin. What's liberal about that? That's not liberal. That's the opposite of what Martin Luther King talked about, judging people based on the content of the character, not the color of their skin.

I was for women's rights, but then that wasn't enough, and I had to be for the right of a woman to be firefighter, if she wanted to be, even if she wasn't strong enough to carry a man out of a burning building. I don't think a woman has an inalienable right to be a firefighter.

Free speech, that's what liberals were really about. Look at any college campus today where there's a demonstration against somebody speaking, where they shout down somebody speaking because they don't like what that person is saying, and inevitably, the people doing the shouting down will be liberal students.

I said, "You know what, that's not for me anymore."


Read it all here.

Monday, June 18, 2007

John Hawkins interviews John Ensign, National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman

Over at Right Wing News, John Hawkins has an interview with National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Ensign:

John Hawkins: Sure, I understand. Give me an estimate of how many calls, emails, and faxes that you think the RNSC has received over the immigration issue and maybe what the for and against ratio has been.

John Ensign: The number of calls to our personal offices as well as to the NRSC are overwhelming and they are overwhelmingly against the bill. It's, I don't know, ...a hundred to one against.

John Hawkins: If the Senate amnesty bill passes, Tom Tancredo has pledged to campaign against senators who vote for it. You probably know. I've set up a website called The Payback Project to do the same thing. The number of (commenters) I've seen around the blogosphere who've commented that they're either going to stay home in 2008 or throw their vote away on a third party has been enormous. According to Rasmussen, the public opposes this bill 2 to 1. Given all that, don't you think it's fair to say that if this bill passes, isn't it pretty safe to say that some Republican senators will lose their job as a result?

John Ensign: Well, first of all, I want to see the final version. I don't think people should judge the final version. I'm against the bill as it currently stands. But, if we can make some changes to the bill, I do believe it will be a much better bill than current law is...and it will help actually clean up some things.


Read the whole thing.

Thursday, June 7, 2007

UPDATE: Cloture fails, 45-50

UPDATE: From Michelle Malkin, of course, who has been liveblogging all day:

Somber Harry Reid: "Mr. President, this has been a very difficult time...I was hoping that my friends on the other side of the aisle that a small group shouldn't dictate what happens around here."

Um, yeah.

"We're going to keep the bill off the Senate floor." Proposes having more GOP amendments. "Hopefully, we can do that in the next several weeks...One of my colleagues who has worked very hard on this came into my office and shed some tears."

Bets, anyone? Mine: Lindsay "Hissy Fit" Graham.

Reid extols the DREAM Act provision in the bill that promises illegal alien college tuition discounts not available to Americans and law-abiding immigrants--in violation of a federal ban on such special treatment.

Whines some more about lack of support for his cloture vote.

Reid vows that he will "put aside hurt feelings" and "move on with the anticipation that this bill is something that the country needs" and "hope we can figure out a way to do it."


Thank God. Reid has said that if this final cloture failed, he will drop the bill. While it can of course resurface again, this was their best chance to force it through. The closer we get to election season, the more scared Republican senators will be of alienating their base, although they have already done that anyway. Right now, I -- and a lot of other conservatives -- are breathing a huge sigh of relief.

Michelle Malkin has been liveblogging from the Senate floor:

I liveblogged the vote on the Coburn amendment earlier this morning. The roll call deserves its own separate post. Everything you need to know about your US Senators' commitment to the rule of law is right here. Note that GOP presidential candidate Sen. John McCain didn't bother to cast a vote:


The Coburn Amendment states:

EXISTING LAW.--The following provisions of existing law shall be fully implemented, as previously directed by the Congress, prior to the certification set forth in paragraph (1):
(A) The Department has achieved and maintained operational control over the entire international land and maritime borders of the United States as required under the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-367)

(B) The total miles of fence required under such Act have been constructed.

(C) All databases maintained by the Department which contain information on aliens shall be fully integrated as required by section 202 of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (8 U.S.C. 1722).

(D) The Department shall have implemented a system to record the departure of every alien departing the United States and of matching records of departure with the records of arrivals in the United States through the US-VISIT program as required by section 110 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1221 note).

(E) The provision of law that prevents States and localities from adopting ``sanctuary'' policies or that prevents State and local employees from communicating with the Department are fully enforced as required by section 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1373).

(F) The Department employs fully operational equipment at each port of entry and uses such equipment in a manner that allows unique biometric identifiers to be compared and visas, travel documents, passports, and other documents authenticated in accordance with section 303 of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (8 U.S.C. 1732).

(G) An alien with a border crossing card is prevented from entering the United States until the biometric identifier on the border crossing card is matched against the alien as required by section 101(a)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(6)).

(H) Any alien who is likely to become a public charge is denied entry into the United States pursuant to section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(4)).


Here are the GOP senators who opposed it (I won't list the Dems, because we all know they hate America already):

  • Bennett (R-UT)
  • Brownback (R-KS)
  • Collins (R-ME)
  • Craig (R-ID)
  • Domenici (R-NM)
  • Graham (R-SC)
  • Hagel (R-NE)
  • Hutchison (R-TX)
  • Kyl (R-AZ)
  • Lugar (R-IN)
  • Martinez (R-FL) -- that's me!
  • Murkowski (R-AK)
  • Specter (R-PA)
  • Stevens (R-AK)
  • Voinovich (R-OH)
  • Warner (R-VA)

    The bill just avoided cloture with a 33-63 vote -- again -- but there is still another vote coming up at 5:00. Let's hope we can avoid that. It will help slow momentum, but it won't kill it completely. Keep the pressure on your senators. Get their phone numbers and/or e-mail addresses here, on the official Senate website.

    Also, call the National Republican Senatorial Committee at (202) 675-6000, and the Republican National Committee at (202) 863-8500 (option 1). Tell them all -- politely, of course -- that you will not support any senator who lets this bill pass. Remind them that this bill would be national suicide, costing taxpayers trillions of dollars and that you don't want it passed.

    If it does pass, John Hawkins of Right Wing News is ready with The Payback Project. Hopefully, he won't have to use it. Here is the plan if the bill passes:

    If the amnesty bill in the Senate passes, The Payback Project is going to work through the end of the primary season to defeat any Republican senator up for reelection in 2008 who votes for it.

    Some of the ways we're going to do that include,

    * Googlebombing the targeted senators with negative articles (I know some people are claiming Googlebombing no longer works. They may be right. But, my expectation is that it will work fine because they were saying the exact same thing last year and it worked like a charm).

    * Writing articles like this about each targeted senator, "What Republicans in South Carolina should know before they vote for Lindsey Graham."

    * Making YouTube videos similar to these aimed at the targeted senators.

    * Building up or acquiring in-state email lists of Republicans to use in an effort to convince as many Republicans as possible in the targeted states not to vote for the targeted senators.

    * Making ourselves freely available to the local press to explain, as conservatives, why Republicans shouldn't support the targeted senators.

    * Raising money for viable challengers to targeted senators.

    Our goal will be to either defeat these senators in the 2008 primaries or, if that's not possible, to cause enough early damage to cost them 5k-10k votes in the general election.

    The point of that will either be to put more senators willing to listen to us into office or hurt the targeted senators enough that the GOP will never go against the base again on an issue this important.


    Keep the pressure on. Keep fighting. With any luck, this bill will die in the Senate.
  • Tuesday, June 5, 2007

    Republican Debate Tonight!

    My thoughts:

    7:01 - Opening Statements.

    Tommy Thompson came off looking like a major tool to me. I winced, big time. McCain seemed dry, and I was waiting for Romney to add in at the end of his opening statement, "And who is ready for a great big hug??".

    7:05 - McCain just seems out of sorts tonight. He seems angry, and that's not going to help his case, if he can't open his mouth without looking/sounding pissed off.

    7:07 - No offense, McCain, but we don't need the puffball response. Just answer the damn question. When he actually did answer the damn question (what should we do if the surge fails?), he answered it well. Great answer -- we cannot give up, and must give it a chance to succeed. Audience cheered.

    7:09 - Thompson's answer to the same question was rambling and somewhat ludicrous. He didn't seem to make a lucid point, although the point about Iraqis voting themselves was a good one, albeit potentially problematic. Duncan Hunter answered knowledgeably, and I thought well. Ron Paul just shot himself in the foot, saying it was a mistake to go and a mistake to stay, and that we should pull out now. Caused murmurings from the audience, then applause.

    7:11 - Does Tancredo have a surrender watch on? He seems to be on the same page as Ron Paul.

    7:13 - Brownback was the first one to bring up Iran, saying it was good to have opened a dialogue with Iran. Hunter was asked if he agreed, and he said he did on certain conditions, mentioning the dangers of Iran's nuclear weapons facilities. Hunter also said he would authorize the use of tactical nuclear weapons if there was no other options -- risky stance, but I agree with it.

    7:15 - Giuliani said he'd rather use conventional weapons, but wouldn't rule anything out completely, and agreed that Iran is a threat. Good answer from Giuliani.

    7:17 - Gilmore just parroted what Giuliani and Hunter just answered. How about throwing out something different?

    7:19 - Tancredo is being asked about the immigration reform bill/shamnesty. He's one of the few who has spoken out against it. I love his answer -- he said it would be "disastrous" if the bill passed. But don't apologize for saying "dramatic things" -- that is what needs to be said. Just make sure you walk the walk as well, and actually go after the senators who want to screw us over.

    7:22 - Giuliani seemed to skate around the actual topic at hand, saying the problem with the bill is that there was too much "compromise" in the bill. How about actually answering the question you were asked?

    7:23 - Romney says that shamnesty is unfair to the people who are waiting legally, and there was thunderous applause. I agree and all, but still... is what he said that much of a surprise? I thought that was just common sense, but all right.

    7:25 - McCain is asked to defend the bill as one of the co-authors, something he hasn't been able to intelligently do. He says it is a matter of national security, but doesn't this bill just make national security weaker? How does this make our borders stronger?

    7:26 - McCain went on and on and on and on... Giuliani wanted to respond but McCain wouldn't shut up. Giuliani ate him for breakfast on this, but considering McCain can't sputter out an intelligent defense for his bill, that's not surprising. Romney said he'd enforce the law as it exists with the 12 million illegal immigrants in this country -- does that mean he'd kick them out, like he should? He was pretty unclear.

    7:27 - Here's the obligatory "jobs Americans won't do" line to Hunter. He flat-out said he disagreed, and brought up how quickly those 800+ jobs at the Swift plants were filled when ICE deported the illegal immigrants working there. I love Hunter's passion, but I'd love to see him turn on a little charm. He could use some likeability. Great response, ended with saying, "It's a bad bill." Audience applauded.

    7:29 - Brownback wants "exterior and interior enforcement", and supports the bill if we can do that. Gee, great answer. Thompson says we must secure the border first and foremost, saying we must do that first. Called the bill amnesty -- way to go. But he says "have a secure border, then move on" -- does that mean he would give amnesty after the fence is built?

    7:32 - Ron Paul is a kook. His answer was good -- the economic downfall that would come about if this bill were passed -- but he's a few fries short of a happy meal.

    7:33 - No one said they wanted English to not be the official language of the United States -- except McCain. No surprise there.

    7:34 - McCain keeps talking about how something needs to be done, and he mentions crime, but he doesn't really defend himself. He is unable to make a legitimate point as to why this bill should pass! Hunter wanted to throw something in there, but was passed over.

    7:35 - Thompson is asked if another Thompson should be involved. He says yes, because "Thompson is a great name, and a great addition to the Republican party." Then he goes on to say how he is SUCH a great conservative! Yawn.

    7:37 - Giuliani starts talking about Catholicism, and lightning starts zapping away, interrupting him. Funny.

    7:38 - Romney is called out on his flip-flopping on abortion. He makes no apologies for his past voting record, but how are we supposed to know that he won't flip-flop right back to pro-choice? And what the hell does "the opportunity of the 21st century" have to do with abortion and conservatism?!

    7:39 - Huckabee's got a good response about creationism. Two thumbs way up from me for that one -- he unapologetically defended his belief in God. Heavy applause.

    7:41 - Brownback talked about his cancer, and how he had a "season" to think about God, but he basically just echoed what Huckabee just said (almost word for word).

    7:42 - McCain just kind of contradicted himself on the evolution being taught alongside creationism question, but gave props to Huckabee, saying he couldn't put it more eloquently than Huckabee did, which is what Brownback should have done.

    7:43 - Romney asked about being a Mormon. Says he's a proud question, but then references JFK's "I'm not a Catholic running for President, but an American". I guess that's the best thing he could say. Good statement on how he won't distance himself from his church for political gain.

    7:45 - Ron Paul breaks the momentum, saying we need to stick to the Constitution and keep it out of a central level.

    7:46 - Giuliani asked if scientists are wrong on global warming, says he accepts that view (that humans contribute to global warming). Disappointing, but not surprising. At least the glasses make him look intelligent. Says we need an "Apollo project" to get us independent of oil.

    7:47 - Romney asked about Republicans and big oil. Says we should pursue energy independence as a strategic move.

    7:48 - McCain advocates for nuclear power and alternate energy sources. Says it is a national security issue. Interesting.

    7:50 - Ron Paul says the profits in an open marketplace are not the problem, but the subsidies. Ron Paul is the Ross Perot of the '08 race. He even kinda looks like him. Gilmore says he agrees about the profits.

    7:51 - Gilmore brings up how the Kyoto treaty is flawed. Nuclear power has been brought up multiple times now -- interesting, because global warming fanatics aren't advocating that (probably because they don't actually believe in it!).

    7:52 - Paul is asked about the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Says disruptive behavior should be dealt with, not necessarily homosexuality vs. heterosexuality. Huckabee says it is about conduct, not attitude. Says it is covered by the Uniform Code of Military Conduct, and that he wouldn't change the policy.

    7:53 - Giuliani asked about gays being dismissed from the military for coming out, and he brushes it off. Says it is not the time to discuss it because it is a time of war. He's probably not sure which is the politically smart response to give.

    7:54 - Romney says the policy is working, and that it is not the time to change the policy right now because it is a time of war. McCain heaps praise on our military, and says it would be a mistake to reopen the issue.

    7:55 - Thompson asked what Pres. Bush's role would be, jokes that he wouldn't send him to the UN. Chuckles from the audience. Says he would put him on a lecture series for public service and that he could be a wonderful spokesperson. I like Dubya and all, but public speaking is not exactly his forte!

    7:57 - Brownback asked the same question, says he would ask Pres. Bush what he would like to do. Says Clinton has not been appropriate as an ex-President.

    7:59 - Huckabee asked what happened to the GOP, says we lost credibility due to our bungling of the Iraqi war, Katrina, immigration and corruption. I agree about immigration, but disagree on Katrina and Iraq. We didn't bungle anything about Katrina, Mayor Nagin did.

    8:01 - Hunter asked if Scooter Libby should be pardoned. Kind of sidesteps the question and segues into the Compean and Ramos case, says he would pardon them, applause from the audience. Throws in pretty much everything he stands for right there, but it's a good answer.

    8:02 - Everyone asked whether or not they would pardon Scooter Libby, and most said no (without seeing the transcripts or would wait for the appeal), except Giuliani, who rambled on quite a bit. Romney said he would keep the option open. Brownback said he would pardon him.

    8:11 - Audience member asks a question about Iraq, mentions her brother was killed. Her question ends up being getting our troops out, and is directed to Hunter, who thanks her for her brother's service. Mentions that his son is a Marine who has done two tours in Iraq and is currently in Afghanistan. Says that it is worth it, which is absolutely correct. Explains why we need to stay. Great, knowledgeable answer on how to leave Iraq the right way.

    8:12 - Same question directed to Brownback. Pretty much parrots what Hunter just said. Says he's putting a bill forward tomorrow to make Iraq a tri-state country with Baghdad as the federal center. McCain is asked if he agrees with that, says no. Says the war was mismanaged, which is true. Says that we need to stay and finish the job so that her brother's death is not in vain, because if we don't, more Americans will die. Great answer.

    8:14 - Audience member has a question about the government in Iraq, and how we will stand them up to be a democracy and not just set them up for another dictatorship. Question directed to Paul. Basically says we've had four years to do that, and the way to do that is to stop patrolling the streets and pull out -- surrender, surrender, surrender! Calls everyone else on the stage a neo-con.

    8:16 - Giuliani thanks the audience member for his service, and says that it has made us safer, and getting it wrong would make things worse for us. Re-building the nation will be the most difficult part, he says. Giuliani speaks best when he speaks about the War on Terror -- unfortunately, there is more to being President than just that. Asks if things go well, will it be reported as much as a negative outcome?

    8:18 - Gilmore asked by an audience member if a conservative platform also include a conservationist agenda, and he says yes, the key is energy independence.

    8:20 - Tancredo asked if true conservatives can do more to protect the environment, and he says yes, there is nothing anti-conservative about that, and can protect the environment using conservative principles. Talks about the free market helping with conservation.

    8:21 - Audience member asks Giuliani about health insurance and prescription drug prices. Giuliani says that people should be able to buy their own health insurance and that we need a health savings account, and that health insurance should be like homeowner's insurance. Says socializing healthcare is not the answer.

    8:23 - Hunter asked about how, as the congressman from San Diego, he feels about people who goes through the border into Mexico to get cheaper prescriptions. Says a family member does that, and free enterprise in the U.S. has created 80% of life-saving drugs that exist today. Says we need to be able to buy policies across state lines, which will bring down the cost.

    8:24 - An online question asks about fixing the health care system and a single-payer system, and is directed to Thompson. Says we need to transform the healthcare system into a wellness and prevention system. Basically says we need to be informed and aware, and blah blah blah. I'm not liking Thompson tonight.

    8:26 - Romney asked about his health care plans in Massachusetts, and how conservatives dislike it. Says socialized medicine is not the answer but that everyone needs to be insured without raising taxes -- neglected to say how he did/would do that.

    8:28 - Audience member asks what the most pressing moral question today, and how would he handle it, and it is directed to Huckabee. He says it is respect and sanctity of human life, as a lead-in to abortion and being pro-life. Mentions child and elderly abuse. Says we celebrate life... unfortunately, he didn't exactly answer the question.

    8:30 - Giuliani asked the same question. Says basically the same thing as Huckabee, but adds on that we need to share it with the rest of the world.

    8:32 - Paul's answer to the same question is that we accept preemptive war. Sheesh. This guy should have been in the debate with the liberals. Gets all heated up about how it is "wrong" to not take tactical nukes off the table when it comes to Iran.

    8:33 - Brownback jumps in, saying that it is the pro-life question. Says we cannot nominate someone who is not pro-life. Says he can and will support the nominee of our party, even if it is Giuliani, who is pro-choice. Says we are a party of principle.

    8:34 - Audience member asks Romney about his flip-flopping on immigration, and about how he says the national language should be English, but has campaign ads in Spanish, along with his website. Says he loves immigrants and will reach out to them in any way he can to get them to vote for him -- he shot himself in the foot with that statement, right there. Very telling.

    8:37 - Tancredo said he won't run any ads in any language but English, and we shouldn't be ashamed of English as our national language. McCain came out with a "Muchos Gracias", which prompted laughs all around. Pointed out how there are people of every nationality who have died for this country. True, but that's very different from the people who come here waving Mexican flags and burning American ones.

    8:44 - Asked each candidate why we should expect anything different from 2006 with them, and what led to that defeat. McCain said spending, which led to corruption. Promised to veto every bill with pork attached. Giuliani says spending and accountability, and throws out some hypocrisy, saying Republicans became Democrats. Romney said... well, who knows? He didn't really make any sense. Brownback said spending and ending cancer in ten years -- I guess he is the new John Edwards. Thompson said Washington "changed us". Tancredo said Bush ran as a conservative and governed as a liberal. Paul said foreign policy, and more Iraq-war bashing. It's getting old. Gilmore said principle -- we are no longer a party of principle. Hunter gave a quote from his son, and then followed up that the GOP needs to rejoin the people and families of America. Huckabee said lack of communication.

    8:45 - Tancredo asked by an audience member about immigration and what it means to be American. He says cutting your ties from the past and that we need to cut back the number of people coming, illegally or legally. Says we need to start assimilating people, because it is not happening now -- very correct. Says we shouldn't have to press 1 for English and 2 for another language.

    8:47 - Huckabee disagreed about cutting the number of people coming into the country, but we need a sealed border. Giuliani says he is very uncomfortable with Tancredo's answer -- SHOCKER!

    8:49 - McCain says he disagrees with Tancredo's answer. Says America is the dream around the world, and immigration should be legal and America is a beacon of hope and liberty, and quoted Reagan with the "Shining city on the hill". Says no barriers and no fences.

    8:51 - Audience member asks what they would do to bring back moderates and independents; Gilmore answers. Says conservativism stands for all people. A good answer, but a safe one.

    8:52 - Hunter asked same question. Says we need to move away from the Kennedy wing of the Republican party and calls out Romney, Giuliani, and McCain for schmoozing with Ted Kennedy. GREAT answer, audience cheered. Each candidate asked to respond; Romney seems incapable of responding relevantly to any question he is asked tonight. Giuliani sidesteps the question as well. McCain doesn't answer relevantly, either. All three sidestepped Hunter's challenge. Shocking!

    8:55 - Debate over. Next debate will be on July 23rd; promised to be "revolutionary".

    Final thoughts:

    No one really wowed me tonight. I'm obviously partial to Duncan Hunter, and I thought he did well. Ron Paul is CRAZY -- Romney seemed like a kid on ADD, completely unable to give an answer relevant to the question he was asked. It's hard to pick a clear winner, because no one really stood out to me. Giuliani did extremely well on the War on Terror, as always, but that is the only card he has to play! Arianna Huffington is saying it was John McCain's night -- obviously she wasn't watching the same debate as me. The other candidates seemed to fade into the background and were immediately forgettable, but Tancredo and Huckabee -- especially Huckabee -- were both eloquent.

    Bottom line? I still think Duncan's the best man for the job. Hands down, no contest. The only thing I'd have improved upon would be to add a little humor and likability.

    Monday, June 4, 2007

    Strenghtening America's Borders, one misspelling at a time

    Wow. When I saw this image on Right Wing News, I almost fell out of my chair laughing:



    This image is still live on the RNC's website!

    First of all, how has this been up without anyone noticing the misspelling? I know I'm a grammar nazi and all, but jeez. And since when is letting 12 million illegal immigrants into our country and leaving our borders porous "strenghtening America's borders"?

    UPDATE: The image has now been corrected.

    Friday, June 1, 2007

    Stop Amnesty Now

    Hot Air always amazes me. Those people are brilliant -- I wish I came up with this stuff.

    The RNC has seen their donations drop by 40%, as Americans angrily try to fight against the amnesty for 12 million illegal immigrants that the White House seems so desperate to force on us. But why? That's what I don't understand. This bill is unpopular on both sides of the political fence. They want to give this country away to a bunch of people waving Mexican flags, sending money back to Mexico, refusing to speak English, and refusing altogether to assimilate in any way, shape, or form. Wherever there is a large influx of illegal immigrants, a large influx of crime -- and especially violent crime -- seems to follow. And what will happen to national security when our borders are wide open, free for anyone to penetrate?

    How are we supposed to get through to the idiots in Washington, when even drastically cutting back their money doesn't do it?

    Don't stop -- keep the pressure on Washington. Hot Air is asking everyone to Join the Cero Peso Campaign.



    This is a document with four cero peso notes, free for you to print out and send to the RNC. And while you're at it, send it to the Democrats, too.

    Republican National Committee
    310 First Street, SE
    Washington DC 20003

    Democratic National Committee
    430 S. Capitol St. SE
    Washington, DC 20003

    Also, don't forget to sign Rep. Eric Cantor's No Amnesty Petition:

    The rule of law is vital to the success and character of our nation.

    I strongly urge our nation's leaders to oppose the Ted Kennedy Amnesty Bill currently being considered by the United States Senate.

    Almost two decades ago, amnesty was attempted - it failed. Repeating that mistake will do nothing to secure our borders today.

    America's insecure borders are an enormous threat to our national security - a liability we can not afford in the struggle against gang violence on our streets or in the Global War on Terror.

    We must take steps to secure our border, but amnesty is not the way.

    Our message is simple - do not support amnesty.


    Keep the pressure on. Don't give up. We can send a message to Washington and stop amnesty in its tracks.

    UPDATE:

    Rep. and Presidential Candidate Duncan Hunter has a petition to build the border fence:

    "It’s all too obvious that America is under threat because its land borders are largely porous and unprotected. In response, last year Congress passed, and the President signed into law, legislation calling for the construction of 854 miles of border fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. Despite this legislative mandate by the U.S. Congress, the Department of Homeland Security recently announced its intention to build only 370 miles of fencing along the border, not the 854 miles required by the legislation. The Kennedy-McCain Amnesty bill, also would cut the 854 miles of fence down to 370.

    I wrote the border fence bill and it is not ambiguous. It is not a suggestion. It was passed and signed by the President. It is the law. It has been over six months since we passed that law and only 11 miles have been built. At that rate, it will take us 20 years to build it. If elected President, I will build all 854 miles in six months. In the meantime, it is still the law and the fact that only 11 miles have been built is unacceptable." - Congressman Duncan Hunter


    Be sure to sign it.