I've moved — check out my new blog at cassyfiano.com!

Redirecting in 10 seconds...

Thursday, June 21, 2007

SHOCKING Study: Journalists give primarily to Democrats!!!

Right now, you could knock me over with a feather.

MSNBC made the SHOCKING discovery:

A CNN reporter gave $500 to John Kerry's campaign the same month he was embedded with the U.S. Army in Iraq. An assistant managing editor at Forbes magazine not only sent $2,000 to Republicans, but also volunteers as a director of an ExxonMobil-funded group that questions global warming. A junior editor at Dow Jones Newswires gave $1,036 to the liberal group MoveOn.org and keeps a blog listing "people I don't like," starting with George Bush, Pat Robertson, the Christian Coalition, the NRA and corporate America ("these are the people who are really in charge").

MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes. Only 17 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties.

The pattern of donations, with nearly nine out of 10 giving to Democratic candidates and causes, appears to confirm a leftward tilt in newsrooms.

Gee, you mean most mainstream media journalists lean to the left and support liberal causes!? Say it isn't so!!!

Here's a great quote:

Several of the donating journalists said they had no regrets, whatever the ethical concerns.

"Probably there should be a rule against it," said New Yorker writer Mark Singer, who wrote the magazine's profile of Howard Dean during the 2004 campaign, then gave $250 to America Coming Together and its get-out-the-vote campaign to defeat President Bush. "But there's a rule against murder. If someone had murdered Hitler — a journalist interviewing him had murdered him — the world would be a better place. I only feel good, as a citizen, about getting rid of George Bush, who has been the most destructive president in my lifetime. I certainly don't regret it."

I'm shocked right now, SHOCKED! The mainstream media -- be biased towards the left?! NO! Of course, MSNBC doesn't make that case ("the donor list is only a sampling of over 100,000 journalists"), but who are we kidding.

George Packer, from the New Yorker, is at least honest about it:

The war correspondent for the magazine since 2003 and author of the acclaimed 2005 book "The Assassins' Gate: America in Iraq," Packer gave $750 to the Democratic National Committee in August 2004 and $250 to Iraq war veteran Paul Hackett, an anti-war Democrat who campaigned unsuccessfully for a seat in Congress from Ohio in 2006.

In addition to his reported pieces, Packer also writes commentary for the magazine, such as his June 11 piece ruing Bush's "shallow, unreflective character."

"My readers know my views on politics and politicians because I make no secret of them in my comments for The New Yorker and elsewhere," Packer said. "If giving money to a politician prejudiced my ability to think and write honestly, I wouldn't do it. Fortunately, it doesn't."

But most MSM journalists -- and MSNBC -- act as if Packer is unusual. He isn't. It's completely the norm. The BBC admitted it, and maybe this is the American media's small step.


Don_cos said...

”If someone had murdered Hitler — a journalist interviewing him had murdered him — the world would be a better place. I only feel good, as a citizen, about getting rid of George Bush,”

Why can’t these morons discuss President Bush without referencing murder and Hitler?

COPioneer said...

I have several well meaning liberal friends who STILL think the NPR isn't biased. All I have to do is listen for 5 minutes and I can give them 10 reasons why that 5 minutes was liberally biased.

It's like Satan has sucked their brains from their heads.